wee ee om ee en ee
DEPARIMEMN: Vr ime wear!
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS:
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No. NR3747-14
16 OcLober 2014
From: Chairman, Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sub:
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl : DD Form 149 atd 4 Dec 13 w/attachments
HOMC JPL memo dtd 28 Aug 14
HOMC MIQ memo dtd 22 Sep 14
1
2
3
4) Subject's naval record
a en
(
(
(
(
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy
at Tab A}.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and
Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ali
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3),
the Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case have commented to the effect
that the request warrants partial relief, specifically,
modifying the contested entry by replacing “domestic assault and
child neglect” with “domestic battery.”
CONCLUSION :
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and
(3), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the
following limited corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by modifying
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 10 May 2011 by removing “domestic assault and child
neglect” and substituting “domestic battery.”
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
ec. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
d. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
JONATHAN §. RUSKIN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. 7
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01965-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 27 June 2002 and his undated rebuttal, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5328 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 21 Mar 14 w/attachments (2) HOMC MIO memos dtd 3 Nov 14 and 6 Jan 15 (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 29 March 2010 {copy at Tab A). over your max wt) .” CONCLUSION: Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6393 14
damarv 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #). The Board, fe sens sions of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14
DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11
The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07
He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.